Date Received: Nov 18, 2025
Date Accepted: Apr 22, 2026
Date Published: Jun 30, 2026
Views
Download
Section:
How to Cite:
Optimizing Hepes Levels for Short Term Hypothermic Storage of In Vitro-Produced Bovine Embryos
,
Luong Van Hao
1
,
Nguyen Duc Truong
1
,
Do Thi Kim Lanh (*)
1
Keywords
Bovine embryos, in vitro production (IVP), hypothermic storage, HEPES buffer
Abstract
Hypothermic storage at 4°C offers a practical and low-cost approach for short-term handling of bovine in vitro-produced (IVP) embryos; however, optimal buffering conditions and storage limits for preserving embryo viability remain insufficiently defined. This study evaluated how varying HEPES concentrations and storage durations influence post-chilling survival and developmental competence of Day 7 IVP blastocysts. Across treatments, TCM199 supplemented with 50% FBS supported the highest embryo recovery, and the response to HEPES showed a clear concentration-dependent pattern. Moderate buffering markedly improved embryo stability, with embryos stored in 25-mM HEPES exhibiting the highest post-storage survival and hatching rates (approximately 63% and 37%, respectively). In contrast, insufficient (0 mM) or excessive supplementation (≥ 50mM) resulted in substantially reduced developmental performance, confirming that an intermediate buffering range provides the greatest protection during chilling. Storage duration further shaped embryo outcomes. Embryos maintained relatively high viability between 24-48h of hypothermic exposure (survival ~54-62%), whereas prolonged storage led to a sharp decline in developmental potential, with hatching becoming rare or absent beyond 72h. The total cell number also decreased markedly after extended storage, indicating progressive structural compromise. These findings identify an optimal HEPES range and a practical storage window that together enhance the success of hypothermic preservation of bovine IVP embryos. The study establishes biologically validated parameters that can support the development of reliable, low-cost protocols for embryo storage and transport in research and field applications.
References
Al-Katanani Y. M., Paula-Lopes F. F. & Hansen P. J. (2002). Effect of season and exposure to heat stress on oocyte quality of Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 85: 390-396.
Baccouri W., Wanjala G., Tóth V., Komlósi I. & Mikó E. (2025). The effect of heat stress during the insemination period on the conception outcomes of dairy cows. Animals. 15(13): 2001.
BonDurant R. H. (1982). Preliminary studies on bovine embryo survival following refrigeration. Theriogenology. 17: 431-439.
Chang M. C. (1948). The effects of low temperature on fertilized rabbit ova in vitro, and the normal development of ova kept at low temperature for several days. The Journal of General Physiology. 31: 385-410.
Costa S. H. F., Andrade E. R., Silva J. R. V., Rodrigues A. P. R., Amorim C. A., Lôbo R. N. B., Ohashi O. M. & Figueiredo J. R. (2005). Preservation of goat preantral follicles enclosed in ovarian tissue in saline or TCM199 solutions. Small Ruminant Research. 58(2): 189-193.
Downs S. M. & Mastropolo A. M. (1997). Culture conditions affect meiotic regulation in cumulus cell-enclosed mouse oocytes. Molecular Reproduction and Development. 46(4): 551-566.
Drost M., Ambrose J. D., Thatcher M. J., Cantrell C. K., Wolfsdorf K. E., Hasler J. F. & Thatcher W. W. (1999). Conception rates after artificial insemination or embryo transfer in lactating dairy cows during summer in Florida. Theriogenology. 52(7): 1161-1167.
Janati Idrissi S., Le Bourhis D., Lefevre A., Emond P., Le Berre L., Desnoës O., Joly T., Buff S., Maillard V., Schibler L., Salvetti P. & Elis S. (2021). Lipid profile of bovine grade-1 blastocysts produced either in vivo or in vitro before and after slow freezing process. Scientific Reports. 11(1):11618.
Goodhand K. L., Staines M. E., Hutchinson J. S. M. & Broadbent P. J. (2000). In vivo oocytes recovery and in vitro embryo production from bovine oocytes doner treated with progestagen, oestradiol and FSH. Animal Reproduction Science. 63: 145-185.
Hafez E. S. E. (1971). Egg storage. In: Daniel Jr. J. C. (Ed.). Methods in mammalian embryology. W. H. Freeman Company: 117-132.
Hagen D. R., Prather R. S., Sims M. M. & First N. L. (1991). Development of one-cell porcine embryos to the blastocyst stage in simple media. Journal of Animal Science. 69(3): 1147-1150.
Hansen P. J. (2019). Reproductive physiology of the heat-stressed dairy cow: Implications for fertility and assisted reproduction. Animal Reproduction. 16(3): 549-560.
Hansen P. J. (2020). Incompletely fulfilled promise of embryo transfer in cattle — why pregnancy rates are lower following cryopreservation compared with fresh transfers. Journal of Animal Science. 98(11): skaa288.
Hlas A., Ganesh V., Marks J., He R., Salem A. K., Buckwalter J. A., Duchman K. R., Shin K., Martin J. A. & Seol D. (2024). Buffering mitigates chondrocyte oxidative stress, metabolic dysfunction, and death induced by normal saline: Formulation of a novel arthroscopic irrigant. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 25(2): 1286.
Ideta A., Aoyagi Y., Tsuchiya K., Kamijima T., Nishimiya Y. & Tsuda S. (2013). A simple medium enables bovine embryos to be held for seven days at 4oC.
Scientific Reports. 3 (1173): 1-5.
Ideta A., Aoyagi Y., Tsuchiya K., Nakamura Y., Hayama K., Shirasawa A., Sakaguchi K., Tominaga N., Nishimiya Y. & Tsuda S. (2015). Prolonging hypothermic storage (4oC) of bovine embryos with fish antifreeze protein. Journal of Reproduction and Development. 61(1): 1-6.
International Embryo Technology Society (IETS) (2024). IETS data retrieval report 2024. Retrieved from https://www.iets.org/Portals/0/Documents/Public/Committees/DRC/IETS_Data_Retrieval_Report_2024.pdf on April 14, 2026.
Lindner G. M. & Ellis D. E. (1985). Refrigeration of bovine embryos. Theriogenology. 23: 203-215.
Liu C., Zhang J. & Wang H. (2023). Zwitterionic betaines over HEPES as the new generation of biocompatible buffers: Addressing HEPES-induced reactive oxygen species formation. Biomaterials Science. 11(4): 1123-1135.
Miętkiewska K., Kordowitzki P. & Pareek C. S. (2022). Effects of heat stress on bovine oocytes and early embryonic development—An update. Cells. 11(24): 4073.
Morgan J. F., Morton H. J. & Parker R. C. (1950). Nutrition of animal cells in tissue culture: Initial studies on a synthetic medium. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. 73(1): 1-8.
Nishisozu T., Singh J., Abe A., Okamura K. & Dochi O. (2023). Effects of the temperature–humidity index on conception rates in Holstein heifers and cows receiving in vitro–produced Japanese Black cattle embryos. Journal of Reproduction and Development. 69(2): 72-77.
Ozawa M., Nagai T., Kaneko H., Noguchi J., Ohnuma K. & Kikuchi K. (2006). Successful pig embryonic development in vitro outside a CO2 gas-regulated incubator: effects of pH and osmolality. Theriogenology. 65(4): 860-869.
Sudano M. J., Paschoal D. M., da Silva Rascado T., Magalhães L. C. O., Crocomo L. F., de LimaNeto J. F. & LandimAlvarenga F. D. C. (2011). Lipid content and apoptosis of in vitroproduced bovine embryos as determinants of susceptibility to vitrification. Theriogenology. 75(7): 1211-1220.
Robinson N. J. & McGann L. (2024). Low-temperature cell pausing: An alternative short-term preservation method for cell therapies and biological materials. Biopreservation and Biobanking. 22(3): 150-159.
Thompson J. G. (1997). Comparison between in vivo-derived and in vitro-produced pre-elongation embryos from domestic ruminants. Reproduction, Fertility and Development. 9(3): 341-354.
Ushijima H., Akiyama K. & Tajima T. (2008). Transition of cell numbers in bovine preimplantation embryos. Journal of Reproduction and Development. 54(3): 191-198.
Will M. A., Clark N. A. & Swain J. E. (2011). Biological pH buffers in IVF: Help or hindrance to success. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 28(8): 711-724.
Wolfenson D. & Roth Z. (2019). Impact of heat stress on cow reproduction and fertility. Animal Frontiers. 9(1): 32-38.