Date Received: Oct 27, 2025
Date Accepted: Feb 10, 2026
Date Published: Jun 30, 2026
Views
Download
How to Cite:
Effect of Fish Protein Hydrolysate Concentrations on the Growth and Quality of Hydroponic Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.)
,
Phan Thi Thuy (*)
1
Keywords
Fish protein hydrolysate, nutrient concentration, hydroponic lettuce, growth, quality
Abstract
The study investigated the effects of fish protein hydrolysate (FPH), derived from fish processing by-products, on the growth, yield, and quality of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) grown in a static hydroponic system. Four nutrient treatments were evaluated: a control using a commercial inorganic Snap solution (T1) and three FPH-based solutions at concentrations of 300ppm (T2), 600ppm (T3), and 900ppm (T4). Results showed that the 600ppm FPH treatment (T3) significantly enhanced plant growth and physiological performance compared with the control. Lettuce under T3 achieved the greatest root length (21.4cm), canopy diameter (27.6cm), SPAD value (38.5), and fresh yield (438.2 g plant-1), representing a 22-30% increase over T1. Quality attributes also improved under moderate FPH application. Vitamin C content increased to 10.5 mg 100 g-1 in T3 compared with 7.5 mg 100 g-1 in the control, while nitrate concentration decreased markedly from 398.5 to 242.1 mg 100 g-1. Soluble solids content rose from 3.7 to 4.2°Brix, indicating improved sweetness and flavor. No Escherichia coli or Salmonella spp. contamination was detected in any treatment, confirming product safety. Overall, the application of 600ppm FPH provided an optimal balance between yield, nutritional quality, and microbial safety. These findings demonstrate that fish protein hydrolysate offers a cost-effective and sustainable nutrient alternative for hydroponic lettuce production, promoting circular resource utilization and environmentally friendly agriculture.
References
Ahmed Z. F. R., Alghazal K. H., Askri A. & Nikolaos T. (2021). Evaluation of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) production under hydroponic system: Nutrient solution derived from fish waste vs. inorganic nutrient solution. Horticulturae. 7(9): 292.
Alkaabi A., Almansoori E., Hebsi M. A. L., Aldhaheri S., Hassan F. E., Ali N. A. A, Al Shurafa K. A., Tzortzakis N., Di Gioia F., Ahmed Z. F. R. (2025). Vertical hydroponic lettuce: Impact of organic nutrients on antioxidant phytochemicals. Annals of Agricultural Sciences. 70(1): 100386.
Bugbee B. (2004). Nutrient management in recirculating hydroponic culture. Acta Horticulturae. 648: 99-112.
Choi S., Colla G., Cardarelli M. & Kim H. J. (2022). Effects of plant-derived protein hydrolysates on yield, quality, and nitrogen use efficiency of greenhouse grown lettuce and tomato. Agronomy. 12(5): 1018.
Choi S., Colla G., Cardarelli M. & Kim H. J. (2024) Effects of vegetal protein hydrolysate application method, nitrogen level, and nitrate-to-ammonium ratio on growth and composition of hydroponic lettuce. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 105(1): 599-610.
Colla G., Nardi S., Cardarelli M., Ertani A., Lucini L., Canaguier R. & Rouphael Y. (2015). Protein hydrolysates as biostimulants in horticulture. Scientia Horticulturae. 196: 28-38.
Colla G., Hoagland L., Ruzzi M., Cardarelli M., Bonini P., Canaguier R. & Rouphael Y. (2017). Biostimulant action of protein hydrolysates: Unraveling their effects on plant physiology and microbiome. Frontiers in Plant Science. 8: 2202.
Ghaly A. E., Ramakrishnan V. V., Brooks M. S., Budge S. M. & Dave D. (2013). Fish processing wastes as a potential source of proteins, amino acids and oils: A critical review. Journal of Microbial & Biochemical Technology. 5(4): 107-129.
Goddek S., Delaide B., Mankasingh U. & Körner O. (2015). Challenges of sustainable and commercial aquaponics. Sustainability. 7(4): 4199-4224.
Gómez S. & Gómez C. (2022). Evaluating the use of biostimulants for indoor hydroponic lettuce production. HortTechnology. 32(4): 348-355.
Hassan M. K., Al-Maliki A. H. Q. & Hamza H. A. (2024). Effect of fish protein hydrolysate on growth, yield and storability of some female cucumber hybrids (Cucumis sativus L.) grown in plastic house in Basra. Journal for Technology and Science. 1(3): 49-74.
Heintze S., Beckett M., Kriem L. S., Germer J. & Asch F. (2024). A low-tech approach to mobilize nutrients from organic residues to produce bioponic stock solutions. Agriculture. 14(6): 928.
Igor P., Ljiljana P., Paula P., Marija P. P., Tomislav K., Pavle J. & Mario F. (2024). Protein hydrolysates-production, effects on plant metabolism, and use in agriculture. Horticulturae. 10(10): 1041.
Khan S., Yu H., Li Q., Gao Y., Sallam B. N., Wang H., Liu P. & Jiang W. (2019). Exogenous application of amino acids improves the growth and yield of lettuce by enhancing photosynthetic assimilation and nutrient availability. Agronomy. 9(5): 266.
Madende M. & Hayes M. (2020). Fish by-product use as biostimulants: An overview of the current state of the art, including relevant legislation and regulations within the EU and USA. Molecules. 25(5): 1122.
Matallana M. C., Martínez-Tomé M. J. & Torija I. (2010). Nitrate and nitrite content in organically cultivated vegetables. Food Addit Contam Part B. 3(1): 19-29.
Mendoza-Tafolla R. O., Juárez-López P., Ontiveros-Capurata R. E., Sandoval-Villa M., Alia-Tejacal I. & Alejo-Santiago G. (2019). Estimating nitrogen and chlorophyll status of Romaine lettuce using SPAD and at LEAF readings. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. 47(3): 751-756.
Monterisi S., Garcia-Perez P., Buffagni V., Zuluaga M. Y. A., Ciriello M., Formisano L., El-Nakhel C., Cardarelli M., Colla G., Rouphael Y., Cristofano F., Cesco S., Lucini L., Pii Y. (2024). Unravelling the biostimulant activity of a protein hydrolysate in lettuce plants under optimal and low N availability: a multi-omics approach. Physiologia Plantarum. 176(3): e14357.
Nuzhyna N., Raksha N., Halenova T., Vovk T., Savchuk O., Maievska T., Maievsky K., Tonkha O. & Ostapchenko L. (2024). Fish hydrolysates as potential biostimulants for growing legumes and cereals to reduce temperature stress. The Open Agriculture Journal. 18: 071253.
Olle P. L, Malin H., Karl‑Johan B., Larsson‑Jonsson H. & Siri C. H. (2021). Biogas digestate in vegetable hydroponic production: pH dynamics and pH management by controlled nitrification. Waste and Biomass Valorization. 12: 123-133.
Park Y. & Williams K. A. (2024). Organic hydroponics: A review. Scientia Horticulturae. 324: 112604.
Rajendran S., Domalachenpa T., Arora H., Li P., Sharma A. & Rajauria G. (2024). Hydroponics: Exploring innovative sustainable technologies and applications across crop production, with Emphasis on potato mini-tuber cultivation. Heliyon. 10(5): e26823.
Resh H. M. (2022). Hydroponic food production: A definitive guidebook for the advanced home gardener and the commercial hydroponic grower (8th ed.). CRC Press.
Savvas D. & Gruda N. (2018). Application of soilless culture technologies in the modern greenhouse industry – a review. European Journal of Horticultural Science. 83(5): 280-293.
Xiong D., Chen J., Yu T., Gao W., Ling X., Li Y., Peng S. & Huang J. (2015). SPAD-based leaf nitrogen estimation is impacted by environmental factors and crop leaf characteristics. Scientific Reports. 5: 13389.
Xu C. & Mou B. (2017). Drench application of fish-derived protein hydrolysates affects lettuce growth, chlorophyll content, and gas exchange. HortTechnology. 27(4): 539-543.