The Role of Fish Markets in Organizing Coastal Community Livelihoods: A Case Study of Giao Hai, Nam Dinh, Vietnam

Date Received: Aug 21, 2025

Date Accepted: Dec 12, 2025

Date Published: Dec 31, 2025

Views

25

Download

7

Section:

ECONOMICS, SOCIETY AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

How to Cite:

Khue, N., Dien, N., Ha, P., Xuan, N., & Philippe, L. (2025). The Role of Fish Markets in Organizing Coastal Community Livelihoods: A Case Study of Giao Hai, Nam Dinh, Vietnam. Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 8(4), 2764–2776. https://doi.org/10.31817/vjas.2025.8.4.09

The Role of Fish Markets in Organizing Coastal Community Livelihoods: A Case Study of Giao Hai, Nam Dinh, Vietnam

Nguyen Thi Minh Khue (*) 1 , Nguyen Thi Dien 1 , Pham Thi Thu Ha 1 , Nguyen Truong Xuan 2   , Philippe Lebailly 3

  • Corresponding author: [email protected]
  • 1 Faculty of Social Sciences, Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Hanoi 12400, Vietnam
  • 2 Faculty of Economics and Management, Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Hanoi 12400, Vietnam
  • 3 Economics and Rural Development Department, Belgium University of Liège, Liège 5030, Belgium
  • Keywords

    Small-scale fisheries, power, gender, social capital, informality

    Abstract


    This study analyzes the role of the Giao Hai fish market (Giao Thuy district, Nam Dinh province) in organizing and sustaining coastal community livelihoods. By integrating perspectives from small-scale fisheries, trader–fisher relations, gender analysis, and local ecological knowledge, the research is based on 27 in-depth interviews and participant observation conducted between March and June 2025. The findings reveal that the Giao Hai fish market functions as a strategic hub linking harvesting, trading, and processing, largely governed by informal institutions and community social capital. Relations between traders and fishers simultaneously provide essential financial and logistical resources but simultaneously create asymmetric dependencies. The gendered division of labor ensures the continuity of the supply chain but also reproduces inequalities in economic power. Current challenges include declining fishery resources, price volatility, competition from non-local traders, and limited cold storage infrastructure. The study recommends a combination of socio-economic measures and resource management strategies to secure sustainable livelihoods while protecting and restoring marine resources.

     

    References

    Allison E. H. & Ellis F. (2001). The livelihoods approach and management of small-scale fisheries. Marine Policy. 25(5): 377-388. DOI: 10.1016/S0308-597X(01)00023-9.

    Armitage D. & Marschke M. (2013). Assessing the future of small-scale fisheries in coastal Vietnam and the implications for poverty alleviation. Marine Policy. 40: 556-566. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2013.01.004.

    Béné C. (2003). When fishery rhymes with poverty: A first step beyond the old paradigm on poverty in small-scale fisheries. World Development. 31(6): 949-975. DOI: 10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00045-7.

    Béné C. (2006). Small-scale fisheries: Assessing their contribution to rural livelihoods in developing countries (FAO Fisheries Circular No. 1008). FAO. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/1a1e2dbf-c5d3-40f7-90c8-e7eceab11097/content on March 2, 2025.

    Bennett N. J. (2019). Marine social science for the peopled seas. Coastal Management. 47(2): 244-252. DOI: 10.1080/08920753.2019.1564958.

    Berkes F., Colding J. & Folke C. (2000). Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications. 10(5): 1251-1262. DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1251:ROTEKA]2.0.CO;2.

    Bush S. R., Belton B., Little D. C. & Islam M. S. (2013). The political economy of landscape change: Affordances and constraints in Bangladesh shrimp aquaculture. Development Policy Review. 31(4): 419-438. DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12014.

    Cohen, P. J., Allison, E. H. & Stone, K. (2021). Small-scale fisheries, climate change, and adaptive governance. Global Environmental Change. 69: 102281.

    Elsler L. G., Neil M., Ferse S., Navarrete Forero G., Glaser M. & Schlüter M. (2023). Compliance in small-scale fisheries is linked to fisher-trader relations: Not fishers alone (Southeast Asian case study). Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries. 33(3): 751-766. DOI: 10.1007/s11160-023-09783-6.

    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2014). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2014: Opportunities and challenges. FAO. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/b673bef5-f7a3-43eb-baf9-05221a9c34ef/content on March 2, 2025.

    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2021). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2020: Sustainability in action. FAO. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.fao.org/items/b752285b-b2ac-4983-92a9-fdb24e92312b on March 2, 2025.

    Frangoudes K. & Gerrard S. (2019). (En)Gendering change in small-scale fisheries and fishing communities in a globalized world. Maritime Studies. 18: 241-248. DOI: 10.1007/s40152-019-00156-0.

    Granovetter M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology. 91(3): 481-510. DOI: 10.1086/228311.

    Harper, S., Kleiber, D., et al. (2020). Gender, fisheries and climate change: Emerging lessons. Marine Policy. 118: 103996.

    Kleiber D., Lawless S., Cohen P. J. & Harper S. (2017). Gender and social inclusion in small-scale fisheries: Lessons from the Pacific for implementing the Voluntary Guidelines. Marine Policy. 81: 219-228. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.04.023.

    Marschke M. & Vandergeest P. (2016). Slavery scandals: Unpacking labour challenges and policy responses within the off-shore fisheries sector. Marine Policy. 68: 39-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.02.009.

    Merlijn A. G. (1989). The role of middlemen in small-scale fisheries: A case study of Sarawak, Malaysia. Development and Change. 20(4): 683-700. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.1989.tb00363.x.

    Nguyen T. Q. & Ruddle K. (2015). Changes in the governance of Vietnam’s marine fisheries. Marine Policy. 62: 143-150. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.09.003.

    North D. C. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 5(1): 97-112. DOI: 10.1257/jep.5.1.97.

    Ostrom E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.

    Pauly D., Christensen V., Dalsgaard J., Froese R. & Torres Jr F. (1998). Fishing down marine food webs. Science. 279(5352): 860-863. DOI: 10.1126/science.279.5352.860.

    Patton M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

    Pomeroy R. S., Ratner B. D., Hall S. J., Pimoljinda J. & Vivekanandan V. (2009). Coping with disaster: Rehabilitating coastal livelihoods and communities. Marine Policy. 30(6): 786-793. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2006.02.003.

    Porter M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

    Ruddle K. (2014). Dependent relations and marine tenure in the Asia-Pacific. In: Pomeroy R. S. & Andrew N. L. (Eds.). Small-scale fisheries management:

    Frameworks and approaches for the developing world. CABI: 77-99.

    Scoones I. (1998). Sustainable rural livelihoods: A framework for analysis (IDS Working Paper No. 72). Institute of Development Studies. Retrieved from https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/articles/report/Sustainable_Rural_Livelihoods_A_Framework_for_Analysis/26473384 on June 5, 2025.

    Vietnam Fisheries Administration (VIFEP). (2023). Vietnam Fisheries Statistical Yearbook 2022. Hanoi: MARD. Retrieved from http://vifep.com.vn/1/en-US/research.aspx on June 5, 2025.

    World Bank. (2023). Blue social protection series: Vietnam—Toward just transition in fisheries (includes 2023 decommissioning program). World Bank. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/43045fc1-41c3-4b5b-9882-883bf970e923 on June 5, 2025.